The digger mythology that’s long sustained Australia’s self-image has been shaken by a murderous few with maximum firepower and discretion but minimum oversight.
Consequently, a nation that has cherished and so proudly celebrated its soldier heritage must now confront the fact that some of its military elite may be cold-blooded killers.
Nineteen from the Special Air Service Regiment and 2nd Commando Regiment have stained the distinguished service of their colleagues and eroded the moral authority of the Australian Defence Force.
Some decorated “heroes” now stand accused of being war criminals. It may take courts up to 10 years to decide their fate. Awards for valour, gallantry and bravery will be torn up.
Secrets of War
A special ABC News series pulls together years of investigations and reports shedding light on allegations of serious misconduct and potential war crimes by Australian special forces in Afghanistan.
Read more
In many instances it is the accused soldiers’ platoon colleagues who have dared to bear witness.
They are the brave. They have broken unwritten rules of brotherhood to declare where morality stands and where bloodlines end. Their actions might have saved the SAS being disbanded in its entirety; the honourable who called out the indecent.
This is a big national moment. It is a nasty but necessary reckoning of a shameful recent history.
Thirty-nine Afghan prisoners, farmers, adolescents and civilians allegedly murdered. Eleven other incidents are being investigated.
Read the redacted IGADF report here.
Regiment culture can’t be captured by a lens
For many Australians, it will be hard to believe. Some might argue these men of modern warfare the best of the best, no less shouldn’t be considered criminals when they have only acted in the most difficult of circumstances.
Over the next few years we will hear a lot about judgments made in the “fog of war”, the contention that actions on the frontline have greatest clarity to those who are there to see and feel it in real time.
The reckoning for alleged crimes is about to begin
The soldiers of the SAS have been held up as heroes, yet a small number of them are being accused of the most heinous of crimes, including the murder of innocents, writes Mark Willacy.
Read more
Paul Brereton’s report eviscerates this argument in one short sentence: “None of these are incidents of disputable decisions made under pressure in the heat of battle.”
The age of helmet cameras and sit-reps beamed live to Bungendore headquarters have sharpened back office oversight of the defence shopfront, but full visibility is impossible, and regiment culture cannot be captured by the dead eye of a lens.
Less ambiguous are the rules of war, even if the Afghanistan War lacked a consistent strategic objective or, as a group of serving and former SASR soldiers observed this week, a “clear definition of victory”.
But pursuing legal process, even in supposedly clear instances such as the killing of civilians or the summary execution of detainees, will have great complexity and strain the public’s tolerance for ugly truths.
Success was literally measured in blood
This is not an insignificant issue. It’s also one to which the Government is alert, knowing the experience of its allies.
In Britain, when a Royal Marine sergeant was found guilty of murdering an Afghan prisoner in 2011, the fact it appeared an open-and-shut case didn’t prevent significant backlash.
‘In my books, it’s murder’
For years, the secrets about what the SAS did in the valleys, fields and mud villages of Afghanistan have remained hidden. Until now.
Read more
Sergeant Alexander Blackman was captured in footage from another marine’s helmet camera shooting a captured insurgent in the chest with his pistol at close range.
“There you are. Shuffle off this mortal coil, you c***. It’s nothing you wouldn’t do to us,” Blackman told comrades.
“Obviously this doesn’t go anywhere, fellas. I just broke the Geneva Convention.”
Blackman’s life sentence sparked a major public campaign. Novelist Frederick Forsyth called it a “glaring miscarriage of justice” and the marine’s supporters claimed Blackman had been let down by his chain of command who didn’t properly appreciate combat stress.
The Ministry of Defence conceded Blackman’s overworked, undermanned unit was showing “moral regression, psychological strain and fatigue” that weren’t picked up by superiors. His conviction for murder was eventually quashed, and replaced with “manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility”.
People protested in support of Sergeant Alexander Blackman, who was sentenced to life in 2013 for killing an insurgent in Afghanistan.(Reuters: Toby Melville)
Will similar arguments be heard in Australia? Undoubtedly.
To blame war atrocities on a handful of lone psychopaths would ignore the cultural problems that have been allowed to fester: an absence of moral leadership; the failure of an incurious command; the poisonous influence of “demigod” patrol commanders; the heavy demands placed on a few.
That’s not to diminish the responsibility of those individuals who used disproportionately and immorally used lethal force in Australia’s name.
But the high rotation of Australia’s special forces contributed to moral drift, as did a kill or capture system that incentivised and rewarded bad behaviour.
The Joint Priority Effects List (JPEL) was used by coalition forces in Afghanistan to hunt Taliban targets. The SAS were excellent servants of the JPEL objective which subsumed the regiment’s historic surveillance and reconnaissance role.
The awful reality is that under the influence of certain individuals, some SAS teams became kill squads that competitively tallied victims on “kill boards”.
Success was literally measured in blood.
The Anzac ideal is still worthy of veneration
The Government knows Australia’s international reputation will be tarnished by what Brereton has uncovered.
It fears Australia’s enemies may be animated by the report and domestic extremists encouraged. The Liberal-National coalition may also fret that parts of the defence community which instinctively resists objective scrutiny may resent the intrusion into its business.
Could our elite soldiers be charged with war crimes?
There has long been chatter that international rules of armed conflict have been breached by Australian special forces soldiers in Afghanistan, but the prospect of criminal charges isn’t totally clear-cut.
Read more
It may be all of these things but the four-and-a-half year investigation into suspected war crimes was imperative.
To defend the name of the great majority who have served with honour and distinction, Australia had to admit its terrible wrongdoings.
There was no alternative. But the shock is in how horrific and extensive those crimes were.
Australia’s observance of the digger mythology is in crisis. The Anzac legend has collided with the sick culture of the self-centred warriors who have no respect for the democratic principles they were dispatched to protect and project.
The Anzac is supposed to embody all the “best” bits of the Australian character: egalitarianism, mateship, courage and sacrifice, guided by principle and unyielding ethics.
It’s an ideal still worthy of veneration.
And in this defining moment for the Defence Force and the nation, it’s this ideal that will have to be reaffirmed, even if some in uniform have disgraced it.
Support services

• The Defence all-hours Support Line is a confidential telephone and online service for ADF members and their families 1800 628 036
• Open Arms provides 24-hour free and confidential counselling and support for current and former ADF members and their families 1800 011 046
• Soldier On is a national support services provider for Defence personnel, contemporary veterans, and their families. Contact during office hours 1300 620 380